Appearance
question:Article:Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn is due to publish his tax returns, and Scottish National Party leader Nicola Sturgeon has published hers. Meanwhile, UKIP's Nigel Farage has rejected calls for greater openness over personal tax matters. Unsurprisingly, there are mixed opinions on whether to declare and how much. Share and declare Paul Brazier emails the BBC: "Transparency of tax for all in elected office." When it comes to Mr Cameron's wealth, Raymond Harris writes: "Five hundred thousand pounds is a figure most working people won't see in their lifetime, so I think he should not be hiding it off shore. He should be paying tax on it." Valtid Caushi says: "Pay your tax. It is our unborn children who they are robbing, not the current generation." Wendy Wright emails: "As in Sweden, everyone's tax returns should be public property. This would help to prevent a wide range of financial wrongdoing and help to ensure that everyone paid the proper amount of tax. All current loopholes to avoid tax should be closed immediately." Jim Muir (not the BBC correspondent) tweets: Private and personal David Snelson, in Petersfield, says: "This trend towards all senior politicians publishing tax returns is worrying. We don't pay them that much money, and we now want to delve into all aspects of their personal affairs. Who can we expect to want to lead us in the future. Would Churchill have wanted to be prime minister in such circumstances? Be careful what you wish for!" Stephen Nichols calls this political point-scoring, with Mr Cameron doing nothing illegal, "nothing anybody with a good financial adviser wouldn't be doing". "If there are loopholes, then change the laws," he adds. Philip, in Glasgow, says tax returns should be kept private for everyone, adding: "The urgent need is not sorting out offshore tax jurisdictions, but sorting out the tax credits mess." DSPG is not interested in leaders publishing tax returns, adding: "These should be a private matter, although possibly routinely examined by some central body such as the Register of Interests. I wouldn't want my neighbour to know how much bank interest I get every year (and thus an indication of my assets) especially as I don't flaunt a Bentley on the drive and a Rolex on my wrist." Kath Stevens says she doesn't know what all the fuss is about, adding: "Just about every university vice-chancellor in the UK has a salary of over £200,000 a year, some are getting over £400,000, let alone barristers, chief executives of large councils, probably health authorities, probably senior civil servants, some of you BBC people and senior management in large companies, and don't get me started about the ludicrous amounts bankers are still pocketing. Time everyone got a grip on current reality." Gary Aiken takes it further: "This is just a witch-hunt," he says. "Salary has always been a private matter." And finally, how clear is all of this? Compiled by Sherie Ryder A summary of the above article is?
answer:As the recent Panama Papers leak has sparked global debate on financial transparency, British politicians are facing increased pressure to publish their own tax returns. Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn and Scottish National Party leader Nicola Sturgeon have already published theirs, while UKIP leader Nigel Farage has declined to do so. Opinions remain divided on the issue of declaring personal tax information, with some arguing that it promotes transparency and prevents financial wrongdoing and others asserting that such information should remain private. This debate has led to numerous reactions from the British public, with some emphasizing the importance of fixing larger issues like the tax credit system and addressing financial loopholes, while others have voiced concerns about how this level of scrutiny may impact the willingness of individuals to enter politics in the future.
question:Article: Further along these lines, The ethical problems brought up by IP rights are most pertinent when it is socially valuable goods like life-saving medicines are given IP protection. While the application of IP rights can allow companies to charge higher than the marginal cost of production in order to recoup the costs of research and development, the price may exclude from the market anyone who cannot afford the cost of the product, in this case a life-saving drug. "An IPR driven regime is therefore not a regime that is conductive to the investment of R&D of products that are socially valuable to predominately poor populations".:1108–9 Now answer this question: For what type of goods are IP's ethical problems most pertinent?
answer:IP's ethical problems are most important for goods that are very helpful to many people, like medicines that can save lives. These goods are more important because if they cost too much, some people cannot buy them, and that's not fair. So, we need to think carefully about making sure everyone can get these special goods.
question:Write an article that answers the following question: How many years did the scores on the states standardized test trended upward before eventually decreasing?
answer:Title: A Closer Look at Standardized Test Scores: The Rise and Fall of Performance Trends Introduction Standardized tests have long been a fixture of the American education system. Schools and policymakers closely monitor test results to assess the efficacy of educational programs and interventions. One common question that arises is how many years did the scores on the state's standardized test trend upward before eventually decreasing? This article unpacks this query by examining historical testing data, identifying key trends, and analyzing contributing factors to the rise and decline of test scores. Part 1: A Brief Overview of Standardized Testing Trends In order to answer the question at hand, it is necessary first to have a holistic understanding of standardized testing trends. Over the past few decades, fluctuations in test scores have been influenced by various factors, such as changes in educational policies, the introduction of new tests, demographic shifts, and economic conditions. For this analysis, data from "The Nation's Report Card" or National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) will serve as an illustrative example. NAEP is administered to a nationally representative sample of students in the U.S. and assesses reading and mathematics skills in Grades 4 and 8. Part 2: The Years of Upward Trend for Standardized Test Scores According to the historical data from the NAEP, test scores trended upward for approximately 20 years before they began to decrease. This upward trend in overall performance was observed between the early 1990s and the early 2010s. During this period, average scores for mathematics improved steadily for both Grade 4 and Grade 8 students. Reading scores showed similar improvements, especially in Grade 4. This period of growth in test scores can be attributed to several factors: 1. Implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) in 2002, which placed a strong emphasis on accountability, leading to increased focus on raising test scores. 2. Smaller class sizes, often implemented as a strategy to improve education. 3. The introduction of state and federal initiatives to increase the rigor of learning standards and align curricula with those standards. Part 3: The Downward Trend and Contributing Factors Following the two-decade-long upward trend, standardized test scores began to decline around the early 2010s. This decrease was witnessed in both reading and mathematics scores. Furthermore, the downward trend was consistent across different races, genders, and income levels. There are several possible explanations for the observed decrease in test scores: 1. Shifts in educational policy: Many states shifted focus from NCLB to other state-specific models or adopted the Common Core State Standards, leading to changes in testing methods and potentially contributing to the decline in scores. 2. Economic factors: The Great Recession of 2008-2009 affected many households, with students potentially facing increased levels of stress and instability, which could have had an adverse impact on their academic performance. 3. Demographic shifts: The student population grew more diverse over time, and it is possible that schools struggled to adequately address the varying needs of all students, leading to lower test scores. Conclusion Understanding the trends in standardized test scores is critical for educators and policymakers alike. Our analysis indicates that scores on states' standardized tests trended upward for about 20 years before beginning to decrease in the early 2010s. Several factors, including educational policies, economic conditions, and demographic shifts, contributed to these changes. Moving forward, stakeholders can use this information to prioritize interventions and policies that can not only reverse the downward trend but also foster equity and meaningful improvement in performance for all students.
question:Translate "Studies have shown how, for example, in Norway, the children of agricultural workers are at significantly greater risk of cancer." to Finnish?
answer:Tutkimukset ovat osoittaneet, että esimerkiksi Norjassa maataloustyöntekijöiden lapset ovat merkittävästi suuremmassa syöpäriskissä.