question:Problem: Solve -27*g - 18*g = -28*g + 61*g + 1092 for g. And the answer is...

question:Please answer the following question: Given the following passage "Orientalist scholars of the 18th century like Sir William Jones marked a wave of enthusiasm for Indian culture and for Sanskrit. According to Thomas Trautmann, after this period of "Indomania", a certain hostility to Sanskrit and to Indian culture in general began to assert itself in early 19th century Britain, manifested by a neglect of Sanskrit in British academia. This was the beginning of a general push in favor of the idea that India should be culturally, religiously and linguistically assimilated to Britain as far as possible. Trautmann considers two separate and logically opposite sources for the growing hostility: one was "British Indophobia", which he calls essentially a developmentalist, progressivist, liberal, and non-racial-essentialist critique of Hindu civilisation as an aid for the improvement of India along European lines; the other was scientific racism, a theory of the English "common-sense view" that Indians constituted a "separate, inferior and unimprovable race".", answer the following question. Note that the answer is present within the text. Question: What was the view of superioroty of the Indian race seen as in the 18th century? A:

question:Please answer the following question: The birds were looking around in August, what were they looking to do? A. breathe B. sky C. build a nest D. pick berries E. reproduce The best answer is A:

question:Write a summary based on this article: Former Charles Manson follower Leslie Van Houten confers with her attorney, Rich Pfeiffer, not shown, during a break from her hearing before the California Board of Parole Hearings at the California Institution for Women in Chino, Calif., Thursday, April 14, 2016. (Photo: Nick Ut, AP) A California board granted parole Wednesday to Charles Manson disciple Leslie Van Houten in the 1969 cult killings of grocer Leno LaBianca and his wife, Rosemary LaBianca. Van Houten, 68, was the youngest of Manson's followers. The session with the parole board took place at the California Institution for Women in Corona. Van Houten, who was 19 at the time of the grisly murders, was serving a life sentence. Wednesday marked Van Houten's 21st appearance before the parole board. Van Houten also was granted parole last year, but the decision was overturned by Gov. Jerry Brown. More: Reports: Charles Manson in hospital After a 120-day review process, the governor will have 30 days to approve, reject or do nothing on Wednesday's decision, according to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Over the course of two nights, Manson followers killed seven people. Among them was actress Sharon Tate. Van Houten took part in the LaBianca deaths on the second night. Van Houten's lawyers maintain she has been a model prisoner but prosecutors and families of the victims have vehemently opposed her release, the Los Angeles Times reported. Manson, now 82, is serving a life sentence at California's Corcoran State Prison, according to the Times. Contributing: Associated Press Follow Melanie Eversley on Twitter: @melanieeversley Read or Share this story: https://usat.ly/2eLziMW ||||| Leslie Van Houten, who was convicted along with other members of Charles Manson 's cult in the 1969 killings of Leno and Rosemary LaBianca, was granted parole Wednesday by a panel of state commissioners in Chino. It was the 21st time that Van Houten, 68, has appeared before a parole board, and the second time that commissioners found her suitable for release. “She’s very thankful and relieved,” said Van Houten’s attorney, Rich Pfeiffer. “She’s going home. There’s no question she’s going home. The only question is when.” Gov. Jerry Brown must now once again decide whether to release her after more than 40 years in prison. Brown rejected her parole last year, concluding that Van Houten — the youngest member of Manson’s so-called family — posed “an unreasonable danger to society if released from prison.” RELATED: Where are they now? Charles Manson's family, four decades after horrific murders Her attorneys have long argued that she was only 19 when she took part in the crimes and that she has been a model prisoner. But release has been strongly opposed by the families of the victims as well as prosecutors and many others. State officials will begin a 120-day legal review of the panel’s finding, and after the process concludes, the decision goes to Brown. The governor would have 30 days to take one of five options. He could uphold, reverse or modify the decision, according to the state Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Brown could also send the decision to the full Board of Parole, or he could take no action, which would allow Wednesday’s decision to stand. From left, Manson followers Susan Atkins, Patricia Krenwinkel and Leslie Van Houten walk into a morning court session in 1970. When Manson carved an "X" into his forehead during the trial, his "family" members followed suit. ( Los Angeles Times) She stabbed victim 14 times Van Houten has been considered the least blameworthy member of the group and has been portrayed by supporters as a misguided teen under the influence of LSD on the night of the slayings. A former homecoming queen from Monrovia, she did not join in the Aug. 9, 1969, murders of Sharon Tate, the pregnant wife of film director Roman Polanski, and four others at the Benedict Canyon home that Tate was renting. But the following day, Van Houten was part of a group that stormed into the LaBiancas' home in Los Feliz. As Charles "Tex" Watson stabbed Leno LaBianca, Van Houten and another woman held down Rosemary LaBianca. After Watson stabbed Rosemary LaBianca with a bayonet, he handed a knife to Van Houten. She testified to stabbing Rosemary in the back at least 14 more times. The blood of the victims was used to scrawl messages on the walls, as had been done at the Benedict Canyon home. Leslie Van Houten, shown in 2002, has repeatedly been denied parole. (Peter Phun / Associated Press) A long, winding legal process Van Houten, Manson and three others were convicted and sentenced to death, but after the California Supreme Court struck down the death penalty, their sentences were commuted to life in prison. An appellate court overturned Van Houten’s conviction in 1976, and a second trial the following year ended in a hung jury. She was convicted of two counts of murder and one count of conspiracy in her third trial in 1978 and sentenced to seven years to life in prison. Starting in 1979, Van Houten has gone before the parole board regularly. In recent years, Van Houten’s attorneys characterized her as a model inmate, earning a bachelor’s in English literature and master's degree in humanities while running self-help groups for incarcerated women. At a parole board hearing in 2002, Van Houten said she was “deeply ashamed” of what she had done, adding: “I take very seriously not just the murders, but what made me make myself available to someone like Manson.” Manson, 82, and other acolytes involved in the slaying are still behind bars. Watson and Patricia Krenwinkel have each been denied parole several times. Susan Atkins, who was denied parole 13 times, died in prison in 2009. ‘Shocking nature of the crimes left an indelible mark on society’ A two-member California review board first granted parole to Van Houten in April 2016. In its first recommendation for release, the board based its decision in part on Van Houten’s age at the time of the crime, her length of incarceration, lack of violent crime as an adult and her spotless prison record: She has never been disciplined for serious misconduct while behind bars. But Brown last year disagreed, saying in his five-page decision that all of these points were outweighed by other “negative factors that demonstrate she remains unsuitable for parole.” He said the “shocking nature of the crimes left an indelible mark on society” and that the motive — to trigger a race war “by slaughtering innocent people chosen at random — is equally disturbing.” In his statement, Brown said it remained unclear how Van Houten had transformed herself from a smart, driven young woman to “a member of one of the most notorious cults in history and an eager participant in the cold-blooded and gory murder of innocent victims.” At her last parole hearing, she said: "I don't let myself off the hook. I don't find parts in any of this that makes me feel the slightest bit good about myself.” Other Manson followers have been denied parole. Patricia Krenwinkel lost her latest bid for freedom earlier this year. ‘She’s going home’ Pfeiffer, Van Houten’s attorney, said Wednesday’s decision by the parole board was an important milestone, calling it “the most difficult one to get.” The panel was aware that the governor had previously rejected her release, but still found her suitable for freedom. Pfeiffer said he was hopeful that this time around, Brown would set aside public pressure and see that his client has been rehabilitated. “If he rejects it, we’ll go back to court,” Pfeiffer vowed. “I’m not going away, and she’s going home.” Family members of the LaBiancas spoke out against her release. "No member of the Manson family deserves parole, ever," nephew Louis Smaldino said, according to the Associated Press. "She is a total narcissist and only thinks of herself and not the damage she has done." "Please see to it that this fight doesn't have to happen every year for the rest of our lives," added La Biancas' oldest grandson, Tony LaMontagne. Charles Manson is escorted to court for a preliminary hearing in 1969. (Bill Murphy / Los Angeles Times) Support our journalism Please consider subscribing today to support stories like this one. Already a subscriber? Your support makes our work possible. Thank you. Get full access to our signature journalism for just 99 cents for the first four weeks. ALSO: Manson follower Patricia Krenwinkel's bid for freedom denied, despite claims he abused her Quentin Tarantino could bring the Manson family murders to the big screen UPDATES: 11:47 a.m.: This article was updated with reaction from the LaBianca family. Sept. 7, 7:20 a.m.: This article was updated to add that Manson follower Patricia Krenwinkel lost her parole bid earlier this year. 7:15 p.m.: This article was updated with additional background and comments from Leslie Van Houten’s attorney. 5:20 p.m.: This article was updated with additional photos. 4 p.m.: This article was updated with details about next steps. 3:40 p.m.: This article was updated with the parole board’s decision. This article was originally published Sept. 6 at 8:09 a.m. ||||| Summary: