answer:Sara decorated their Christmas tree, and she had to choose between a cross tree topper and a star tree topper. She didn't pick the cross tree topper because it was too heavy. Instead, she chose the star tree topper. The star wasn't too heavy, so it was a better choice for her tree. This way, the tree could stay balanced and beautiful for the holiday.

answer:Keep the email you sent last night hidden from the head office. The head office is too unforgiving. This means the people at the head office don't easily forgive mistakes, so it's best not to let them see the email.

answer:Can't answer

answer:It is a grotesque oversimplification to assume that Obama is the source of all the trouble there. Origins of conflicts, especially ones as complex and loaded as the Iraq conflict, have to be understood through a more nuanced lens. It involves a wide array of factors, players, history, and circumstances that create an environment conducive to violence and instability. Firstly, it's important to acknowledge that the conflict in Iraq predates Obama's administration. The invasion of 2003, launched during George W. Bush's presidency, dismantled existing structures in Iraq, contributing significantly to the destabilization of the region. Irrespective of whether the invasion was justified or not, the direct consequence was a power vacuum that successive administrations and Iraqi governments have struggled to fill. The sectarian divisions and deep-rooted tensions unleashed during this period continue to trigger violence, including the rise of ISIS. Secondly, it's essential to realize that the administration's decision to withdraw troops was based on a Status of Forces Agreement signed under Bush's presidency in 2008. The agreement established a framework for U.S. military withdrawal by December 2011, and Obama's administration honored this pact. Moreover, the idea to keep a residual force was met with close resistance from the Iraqi administration, mainly due to concerns related to the troops' legal immunity from Iraqi law. Thirdly, pointing fingers at foreign actors ignores the role of domestic dynamics in Iraq. Iraq's troubles are closely tied with a splintered political landscape, sectarianism, corruption, and economic troubles that have fuelled dissatisfaction and resentment among various factions. Lastly, the rise of extremist groups like al Qaeda presents a global problem. Their strength in Iraq is part of a wider trend, with footholds in Syria, Afghanistan, and many other regions. They exploit the local dynamics and instability, becoming yet another player in a multifaceted conflict. The bottom line here is that Iraq's present situation, however dire, is the result of numerous factors at play, some of them going back to decades. Thus, reducing the issue to the decisions made by a single president or country undermines the complexity of the situation. While it's critical to evaluate and learn from past foreign policy decisions, it's also crucial to have a nuanced understanding that can pave the way for more effective future strategies. The situation calls for a focused and collective international effort to stabilize the region and address the root causes of the conflict on a long-term basis.