answer:(ii) no. The answer provided is not a good answer to the question because it discusses the height of mountains in Quebec, not in New Hampshire. The question specifically asks for the height of mountains in New Hampshire, so the provided information about the Quebec mountain ranges is not relevant.

answer:The water level was lower in March.

answer:Based on the information provided, the hypothesis is not entailed by the premise. In the premise, it is mentioned that "Two smiling boys are sitting beside a fruit cart." While in the hypothesis, it says "Two boys are pulling a fruit cart." The actions of the boys (sitting beside vs. pulling) and their interaction with the fruit cart are different in both statements. So, the correct answer is "no."

answer:If companies move overseas, it may result in less pollution in the original location, leading to potentially less negative effects on the local environment. Regarding the second effect mentioned, the pollution negatively affecting water quality, the impact of the perturbation could be quantified as follows: 1. More effect: Moving companies overseas could decrease pollution in the original location, resulting in improved water quality. This is because the contaminants that were previously being discharged into the natural water sources such as rivers and lakes may now be reduced or eliminated altogether. The relocated companies may also be subject to stricter environmental regulations in other countries, further reducing their pollution output. This would mean that there is a positive impact on water quality and potentially the overall health of the local ecosystem. 2. Less effect: While relocating companies overseas might lead to the reduction of pollution in the original location, it could also potentially result in worse environmental conditions elsewhere. In this scenario, the overall global impact on water quality due to pollution may not have a significant decrease, as the pollution is simply being shifted from one location to another. Moreover, if the host country lacks strict environmental regulations or enforcement standards, the pollution levels could even become worse. 3. No effect: If the relocated companies continue to pollute at the same rates in their new locations, there may not be any significant change in the global environmental impact. In this case, the negative effects on water quality would persist, leading to continued harm to aquatic plants, animals, and overall ecosystem health. In conclusion, the supposed perturbation of moving companies overseas might have varying effects on the pollution levels and, subsequently, water quality. The outcome would largely depend on the relocation destination and the company's adherence to environmental regulations. This move could result in better water quality in the original location, but it might not have a significant global impact if the pollution is simply relocated or if environmental standards are less stringent in the new location. Consequently, the overall effect on water quality could range from more, less, or no effect, depending on the specific circumstances surrounding the company's move overseas.