Appearance
question:Three old cars displayed in an auction event have different manufacture dates. The first car, made in 1970, was made 10 years earlier than the second car. The third car was manufactured 20 years later after the second car was manufactured. Calculate the year that the third car was made. Let's think first. Chain of thought:
answer:1. We know the first car was made in 1970. 2. The second car was made 10 years later than the first car. 3. To find the year the second car was made, we add 10 years to the manufacture year of the first car (1970 + 10). 4. The second car was made in 1980 (1970 + 10 = 1980). 5. The third car was made 20 years later after the second car was manufactured. 6. To find the year the third car was made, we add 20 years to the manufacture year of the second car (1980 + 20). 7. The third car was made in 2000 (1980 + 20 = 2000).
question:Choose your answer from options. Premise: "Overall, How Do These Tax Incentives Affect National Saving?" If this premise is true, what does that tell us about whether it entails the hypothesis "How might the National Savings be affected by the tax incentives?"? Choices: A). yes B). it is not possible to tell C). no
answer:B). it is not possible to tell The premise "Overall, How Do These Tax Incentives Affect National Saving?" doesn't provide any information about how tax incentives specifically affect national savings. Rather, it is asking a question about the relationship between the two without drawing any conclusions. Thus, it does not entail (or support) the hypothesis "How might the National Savings be affected by the tax incentives?". A) Yes is incorrect because, as explained above, the premise does not support the hypothesis as it is just a question and not a statement with any additional information. C) No is incorrect because it would suggest that there is definitively no relationship between the premise and hypothesis, which is not the case. The premise is simply asking a question, and the hypothesis is asking a similar question, but there is no definitive connection between them.
question:Use the following highlights to write an article: Launch party sees former stars of the reality TV show return to the set. Visitors will be able look around the famous house for two days. Trust said it will allow people the chance to experience the iconic TV location. But former MP Ann Widdecombe called it 'tawdry' and 'celebrity-obsessed' Article:
answer:Title: A Special Peek Inside an Iconic TV House: The Launch Party Returns Former Stars Once upon a time, there was a magical house where a bunch of people lived together, and their everyday life was shown on TV. This house became very famous, and many people loved watching the show. A big party was thrown, and all the stars who once lived in that house came back for the fun! Visitors, like you and your friends, will get a chance to explore this magical house for two whole days! The people who own the house, called the Trust, want to give everyone a chance to see what it's like inside the famous TV house. But, some people, like a lady named Ann Widdecombe, don't think it's a good idea. She says the party is about making a big fuss over celebrities, and she thinks it's a little silly. Despite what some people think, the launch party will happen, and people will get to see the famous house with their own eyes!
question:After the second world war Germany and France took two different policies in respect to taxation. After the war Germany, then West Germany, has mostly elected pro-capitalist governments. As a consequence, Germany implemented tax rate below the critical rate. But France took the other way. Their mostly pro-socialist governments implemented tax rate above the critical rate. As a result, businesses had to make informed decisions while doing business in these countries. Given the paragraph above, please answer correctly the following question: Which country would have higher labor supply in response to their taxation? A:
answer:Germany