Appearance
question:On an August afternoon last year, Pamela Rivers, 40, and her friend Rita Graham, 38, were stopped at a red light on Cobb's Creek Parkway in South Philadelphia when a white SUV traveling in the opposite direction turned across traffic in front of them. It then jumped the curb and rushed through a grassy expanse before plunging down an embankment toward Cobb's Creek. Pamela quickly pulled over, jumped out of her car, and dialed 911. Kenny Gibson, 23, and his friend Taron Green, 25, were driving home from a job when Rita flagged them down. Kenny stopped, and the men got out of the car and looked over the cliff. The SUV had landed upside down in five feet of water. A woman's leg could be seen swinging out the driver's side window. "I have a fear of water," Kenny said now. "I almost drowned when I was nine." Even so, he and Taron hurried down the 50-foot embankment into the muddy water. "I couldn't just leave her," he adds. The men waded out to the car and saw that the woman, Cheryl Allison, 61, was partially in water. Kenny tried unsuccessfully to open the door. Then he broke the window. But when he reached in to pull out Cheryl, he found she was trapped by the seat belt. "Run back to the truck and grab a box cutter ," Kenny yelled to Taron. Meanwhile, Kenny tried in vain to push the car onto its side to create an air pocket for Cheryl. That's when mechanic Marcell Porter approached the site. "I flipped into rescue mode," he said. When Taron returned, Kenny cut through the seat belt with the box cutter. He and Marcell tried to pull Cheryl out, but she wouldn't come out. Marcell broke the rear window with a rock, hoping to rescue her from the back. Then he saw that she was still strapped in by her shoulder belt. Marcell reached for the box cutter and cut the remaining strap in two. Kenny leaned in, grabbed Cheryl by the waist, and pulled her out feet first. Marcell grasped Cheryl's legs, and they managed to drag her lifeless body onto a rock. "Give her CPR!" Pamela yelled down to them. But the two men had no idea what to do. "Put your mouth on her mouth and breathe," she shouted to Marcell. And to Kenny, "Pump her chest!" "We tried three times," said Marcell. Finally, Cheryl brought up water and started moving her fingers. The men rolled her over onto her stomach to let out more water. Soon an ambulance arrived and transported Cheryl to the hospital, where doctors treated her. They never discovered what caused her to pass out, but she assumes it had something to do with the burning summer heat. Over the next few days, they took turns visiting Cheryl in the hospital, where they shared hugs and tears. "We couldn't believe she was all right," said Pamela. "It's just amazing that these people came together," said Cheryl. She stays in touch with her "angels" via frequent phone calls. "They are really beautiful people," she said. Answer the following questions: 1. Why is Kenny scared of water? 2. who was at the light? 3. how old is Pamela? 4. who was stuck in the car? 5. how old is she? 6. what did they think she suffered from? 7. did they save her? 8. who pumped her? 9. did they know what to do? 10. who was the mechanic? 11. what did kenny ask Taron to get? 12. what did kenny do meanwhile? 13. how low was the embankment? 14. what color was Cheryl's car? 15. what type? 16. who called 911? 17. who did she stop for help? 18. what did they see was out the car? 19. how did they pull her out? 20. how does Cheryl now communicate with them?
answer:1. Kenny is scared of water because he almost drowned when he was nine years old. 2. Pamela Rivers and her friend Rita Graham were at the light. 3. Pamela is 40 years old. 4. Cheryl Allison was stuck in the car. 5. Cheryl is 61 years old. 6. They assumed she suffered from something related to the burning summer heat, although the exact cause was never discovered. 7. Yes, they managed to save her. 8. Kenny pumped her chest during CPR. 9. Initially, the two men who went down to rescue Cheryl did not know what to do, but they followed Pamela's instructions for CPR. 10. The mechanic is Marcell Porter. 11. Kenny asked Taron to get a box cutter. 12. Meanwhile, Kenny tried in vain to push the car onto its side to create an air pocket for Cheryl. 13. The embankment was 50 feet low. 14. Cheryl's car was white. 15. It was an SUV. 16. Pamela called 911. 17. Rita stopped Kenny Gibson and Taron Green for help. 18. They saw a woman's leg swinging out of the driver's side window. 19. They pulled her out feet first after cutting her seatbelt and shoulder belt with a box cutter. Kenny grabbed Cheryl by the waist, and Marcell grasped her legs, dragging her lifeless body onto a rock. 20. Cheryl now communicates with her rescuers through frequent phone calls.
question:Would a linguist find the following sentence to be a valid English sentence grammatically? Brenda chatted Molly. OPTIONS: -unacceptable -acceptable
answer:-unacceptable A linguist would find this sentence to be grammatically unacceptable. The sentence should be "Brenda chatted with Molly." The word "with" is needed to show the interaction between Brenda and Molly. The sentence "Brenda chatted Molly" might sound like Brenda talked to Molly, but it is not a proper way to express that idea in English.
question:Premise: "9 million associated with the simulation scenario or a cost of 13." Based on this premise, is the hypothesis "The simulation scenario had 10 million associated or a cost of 10." true?
answer:To evaluate the hypothesis, let's compare it to the premise step-by-step: Premise: "9 million associated with the simulation scenario or a cost of 13." Hypothesis: "The simulation scenario had 10 million associated or a cost of 10." 1. Compare the number of associations with the simulation scenario: Premise: 9 million Hypothesis: 10 million The values are different, so this part of the hypothesis does not match the premise. 2. Compare the cost associated with the simulation scenario: Premise: 13 Hypothesis: 10 The values are different, so this part of the hypothesis does not match the premise either. Since both parts of the hypothesis do not match the premise, the hypothesis "The simulation scenario had 10 million associated or a cost of 10" is not true based on the given premise.
question:1. The Chief Justice was the Chief Justice of the High Commission territories ( Swaziland , Bechuanaland Protectorate , Basutoland ) , and from 1951 onwards were Chief Justices : 2. The Chief Justice was the Chief Justice of the High Commission territories ( Basutoland , Bechuanaland Protectorate , Swaziland ) , and from 1951 the Chief Justice : Select your answer from the options. Are these two sentences paraphrases of each other? pick from the following. (I). no (II). yes...I think the answer is
answer:(I). no Although both sentences refer to the Chief Justice of the High Commission territories and mention the same three territories (Swaziland, Bechuanaland Protectorate, and Basutoland), they are not exact paraphrases of each other for two reasons: 1) The order of territories listed is different: the first sentence lists "Swaziland, Bechuanaland Protectorate, Basutoland," whereas the second sentence lists "Basutoland, Bechuanaland Protectorate, Swaziland." 2) The phrasing of dates is different: in the first sentence it says "from 1951 onwards," and in the second sentence it says "from 1951." This subtle difference may lead to a different interpretation of when the Chief Justice's role began.