question:Instructions: A text is given in Tamil. Translate it from the Tamil language to the Malayalam language. The translation must not omit or add information to the original sentence. Input: இந்த வாய்ப்பை நாம் தவற விட்டுவிடக் கூடாது. Output:

question:1. Hess and Heder allow Napoleon to remain his geeky self from beginning to end, a guy who -- like his movie -- dares to be different and succeeds. 2. A giant inside joke for those who know the peculiarities of rural Idaho. 3. Funny enough that I'll refrain from describing the gags that made me laugh, lest I spoil them for you. 4. It's a quirky, fresh slice-of-life more inviting than a tater-tot pyramid. 5. It's an empty, affected experience, and a 5-minute joke stretched out to 85 of the most soul-sucking, higher-power-questioning minutes found in a movie this year. 6. We laugh at all the nerdy behavior in the movie, and there's a reason that's OK: Because, deep down, we know we are all nerds. 7. He makes Geekus Hollywoodium -- always played by someone such as Ben Stiller, whom we know to be fundamentally cool beneath his nerdy veneer -- look like the fraudulent genus we know it to be. 8. An independent take on a Hollywood tradition, undermined by its cliches but saved by its performances. 9. May be the most condescending comedy ever to imagine itself being too cool for the room. 10. This is basically a collection of hit-and-miss skits that are stumbling around in search of a story line. What is a brief summary of the following reviews?

question:Write a positive tweet. Possible tweet types: [-] negative [-] positive

question:I started reading beauty blogs rather than magazines because I loved their honesty. With magazines, I was always a little suspicious that the review wasn't true, that it was more an advertorial than an honest article. Blogs seemed more honest - I never distrusted the review. Plus they went into so much more depth than magazines ever did. I think that the day I discovered beauty blogs was probably also the day my magazine addiction came to an end. BUT, there is one issue that I do have with blogs and that is editing, or grammar to be more precise. Now, don't get me wrong, it is not all blogs that I have this issue with. In fact, the majority of blogs I do read are very well written. But, I still come across a few that don't know the difference between your & you're; where, we're & were; and their, there & they're and this is a massive pet hate of mine. The odd typo doesn't bother me. We all make them. I know I do as I usually only proof read once but repeatedly writing there instead of their or where instead of were drives me mental. I just want to bust out a red pen and edit the post. The carton below, which is floating around Facebook at the moment, was my inspiration for writing this post as it really highlights how, by making the slightest grammatical error, the entire meaning of the sentence changes. I suspect that, if you are a similar grammar fanatic, you are sitting here, nodding your head, thinking 'man, that drives me crazy, too!'. If you are not a grammar fanatic then you might be thinking 'hey, what are you whinging about - it is only a couple of letters out of order'. This is why it annoys me so much - I read a sentence but it doesn't quite make sense, so I have to go back and read it again to get an understanding. As soon as I start doing that, I am no longer reading the content of the post but am instead trying to decipher what is being written. As soon as I have stumbled over a few sentences I give up and stop reading. How long does it take the author to correct written contents? Pick the correct answer from the following options: A. more than 2 hours B. 2 hours C. several minutes D. not enough information A: