answer:Okay kiddo, let's make it simple. This article is talking about three things: frame size, scanning system, and frame rate. Sometimes, if people know what's being talked about, they don't need to say all three things. But they still need to say the scanning system and one of the other two. So, the two parameters that can't be dropped when their value is understood are: the scanning system and either frame size or frame rate.

answer:A batter with a very thin consistency indicates that too much milk was added during the process. In this case, the supposed perturbation is directly impacting a step of the process. Specifically, it is affecting the step in which the milk is mixed in with the dry ingredients. The incorrect measurement of milk results in an imbalance of wet to dry ingredients, causing the batter to become too thin and adversely affecting the final texture of the pancakes. To correct the issue, you can add more dry ingredients (flour) in small increments until the batter reaches the desired consistency.

answer:To answer this question, we need to evaluate the cost of the Sunday Family Buffet for the father and the child. 1. According to the article, the buffet costs 98 yuan per adult. Therefore, the father's cost will be 98 yuan. 2. The child is eleven years old, which means they are under 12 years old. The article states that children under 12 eat for free (two at most). Considering this information, the father will pay only for himself (98 yuan), while the child will eat for free. Therefore, the correct answer is: C: 98 yuan.

answer:To rate the given review, I will consider the following factors: 1. Clarity: Does the review provide clear information and opinions? 2. Detail: Does the review include sufficient details to understand the user's experience? 3. Relevance: Is the review relevant to the topic (Google Play Store apps)? 4. Subjectivity/Bias: Does the review exhibit any excessive personal opinions or biases? 5. Length: Is the review reasonably long to convey enough information? Evaluating the review "Google playstore Apps": 1. Clarity: The review does not provide any clear information or opinions about the apps, making it difficult to understand the user's perspective. 2. Detail: The review lacks details about specific apps, features, or experiences, providing little insight into the user's experience. 3. Relevance: The review is related to Google Play Store apps, which is the topic. 4. Subjectivity/Bias: The review does not provide any personal opinions or biases. 5. Length: The review is very short, limiting the amount of information it conveys. Considering these factors, I would rate this review a 1 out of 5. It is unclear, lacks detail, and provides little to no insight for readers who might want to learn more about Google Play Store apps from the perspective of the reviewer.