Skip to content
🤔prompts chat🧠
🔍
question:Question: Once again, I've analysed my year of travel to see if I'm any closer to reducing it year on year. It's an annual habit, and if often kicks off new ideas that might affect my team's next year of work. The good answer is: yes, there is less travel! And not just that, but having reduced the schlepping I do, I've been able to hire more amazing people to lead on our work, and celebrate one of NoTosh's best years ever in terms of the quality, quantity and breadth of work we're doing. Key to traveling less has been a marked increase in the number of folk who see and are now reaping the value of working with us online. I've avoided as many as 20,000 miles of travel thanks to greener clients, who are also many dollars better off having not paid for the airmiles that are wrapped up in our regular fee structure. The quality of our work is better, too, thanks to this. We are doing fewer of those day-long workshops with teachers or leaders, when an hour or even thirty minutes before the day gets started is more worthwhile. We're seeing more school leaders take this up, although it's harder to get teachers into the habit of taking 30 minutes 'me time' to jump into a coaching session on the day or week ahead. But it's starting, and the value to us all is huge. Coaching is very different to 'consulting a Personal Learning Network' on Twitter. It's intense, targeted, focussed and involves a one-on-one discussion that arrives quickly at resolutions to current day challenges that will have a long-term impact. And we come back to measure whether that impact actually happened. I don't think it's a way of working that many are used to in Education, although many corporate clients have had some rare experience with it. Encouraging both groups to take more regular time out for coaching, little and often, is a real challenge, but we're beginning to see some huge impact from relatively little input (and relatively few dollars!). Question: What is probably true about airmiles? Options: A. Airmiles are rewarding B. not enough information C. Airmiles are costly D. Airmiles are inexpensive === The correct answer is Answer:

answer:C. Airmiles are costly

question:Premise: "The mainstream media do not cut George W. any slack." Based on this premise, is the hypothesis "George isn't given any slack by the mainstream media." true? Pick from: (I). yes; (II). it is not possible to tell; (III). no;

answer:(I). Yes, the hypothesis "George isn't given any slack by the mainstream media" is true, based on the given premise. The premise states that "the mainstream media do not cut George W. any slack." This indicates that the mainstream media, as a group, holds George W. to a strict standard and does not give him any more leeway or leniency that they would to anyone else. They are consistently critical and do not overlook any missteps, errors, or critiques that may arise. Considering that the hypothesis aligns with the premise, it is accurate to say that the hypothesis is true. The hypothesis simply rephrases the premise by stating "George isn't given any slack by the mainstream media," which is another way of saying the same thing. Both the premise and hypothesis suggest that the mainstream media does not give George any slack and holds him to a high standard, without providing any exemptions or special considerations due to his potential status or influence. In conclusion, based on the premise provided, the hypothesis "George isn't given any slack by the mainstream media" is true, as it conveys the same idea as the premise with slightly different wording. This conclusion falls under option (I) according to the given choices.

question:Are the following two questions the same? How old is the Hindu religion? When did Hindu religion begin?

answer:While the two questions – "How old is the Hindu religion?" and "When did the Hindu religion begin?" – may seem quite similar at first glance, they are seeking different types of information. Although both inquiries aim to understand the origins and age of Hinduism, they have distinct emphases that warrant a closer evaluation. The first question, "How old is the Hindu religion?" requests a specific duration or timeframe to accurately gauge Hinduism's age. Answering this query necessitates providing an estimated or definite number of years since the religion's inception. The Hindu religion is one of the oldest surviving religions globally, with its origins believed to date back to approximately 4,000 years ago. However, this estimation is contingent upon various factors, including archeological findings, historical texts, and evolving hypotheses. Scholars attribute Hinduism's roots to the ancient Vedic religion, which emerged between 1500 and 500 BCE in the Indian subcontinent. The period, characterized by the composition of sacred Vedic texts, saw the formation of early Hindu beliefs and practices. Consequently, it is plausible to argue that Hinduism is approximately 2,500 to 4,000 years old, although precise dating remains subject to scholarly debate. As archeological discoveries and historical research progress, these estimations may be subject to revision. Meanwhile, the second question, "When did Hindu religion begin?" necessitates identifying a specific era or period when Hinduism initially materialized. Instead of providing a numerical age, this inquiry seeks the pinpointing of a historical timeframe. As previously mentioned, Hinduism emerged between 1500 and 500 BCE, as the Vedic religion developed in the Indian subcontinent. Throughout this era, sacred scriptures – the Vedas – were composed, forming early Hinduism's belief system. Although exact dates remain uncertain, the Vedic period (1500-500 BCE) is generally referenced as the beginning of the Hindu religion. In conclusion, while both questions center around comprehending the age and origins of Hinduism, they convey distinct focuses. The first question revolves around determining the religion's age in terms of years, while the second question seeks to uncover the historical period when Hinduism commenced. Nevertheless, answering both questions requires an understanding of Hinduism's roots in the Vedic religion and the significance of the Vedic period – 1500 to 500 BCE – to the development of this ancient faith.

question:Yes / no, is the following a verifiable fact? "One of the most well known European folklore characters is Little Red Riding Hood." Chain of thought and solution for this question is:

answer:Yes, it is a verifiable fact that Little Red Riding Hood is one of the most well-known European folklore characters. Chain of thought and solution: 1. Define the subject: Little Red Riding Hood is a character from European folklore. 2. Identify the claim: Little Red Riding Hood is one of the most well-known European folklore characters. 3. Assess the credibility: Numerous scholarly articles, books, and adaptations of the story across different cultures and media support the widespread popularity of the character. 4. Find supporting evidence: The fact that the story has been adapted into various forms (including theater, film, television shows, and children's literature) and translated into numerous languages indicates its notability as a well-known folklore character. Therefore, based on the evidence from multiple sources and the character's widespread recognition, the statement can be considered a verifiable fact.

Released under the Colossus License.

has loaded